Forum O Britney Spears

zvswgogna

How should we implement items from Sprint Retrospectives
I recommend to change the focus of your retrospectives. Instead of finding ideas, try to focus on how to implement a single idea. Let's say, you have three parts of the meeting: finding ideas, what is the next step, and how to implement that step.
In the first part, you do the idea collecting nothing new here , but in the second part you pick only one idea, which the team will implement during the next Sprint. In the third part, you do a planning meeting like session on how to implement that idea and bring the result the tasks to your Scrum board. It is highly recommended to timebox these parts so that you have enough time for the third part.
With this approach you have your focus and tracking. There is no need to talk about the progress of the idea during on a daily basis, but it can help a lot. Putting the created "idea tasks" into the Sprint Backlog with a different color can also help, but this trick is team dependent.
If you don't have the improvements on your Scrum Board, they won't be visible, and this means that they don't exist (yes, you can have improvements on your Scrum board).
Budgeting is an interesting question. A good Product Owner knows, that continuous improvements are crucial in Scrum the framework is about continuous improvement so it is not a question whether to have them or not. If you still have trouble, then you need to do more coaching and help people understand the importance of continuous improvements on each level. Doing them off the record is not a good idea, because then there is no real transparency any more, which eventually will lead to mistrust between the Product Owner and the Scrum Team.
The improvement idea can be handled within your team (and thus your budget) and should only be implemented if it will result in a direct benefit for your team and thus on the overall progress of your project. Followup starts next standup meeting. You can only implement it if there is real value in it for your team, otherwise the team won't do it. In that case, let it drop.
When succesful, you can distribute this Lesson Learned to the rest of your organisation. Here you cannot do anything except try to convince others (eg your manager) that it would greatly improve your (and possibly other) teams, reduce cost, fasten delivery etc. This is outside your project budget, unless it is decided that you can add this as an additional scope item to do by your team, taking in mind the impact on the available budget. Otherwise it is completely outside your team scope and you can only remind the relevant people of its' importance (with new cases, additional numbers of waste etc.) and check up regularly if there is any progress.
> You can only implement it if there is real value in it for your team, otherwise they won do it
============== they means team? oh, they would (probably) do it at least it looked that way when the idea has been discussed during the retro; but (I don know why) we have no budget for these things, our product manager (he is running standups) will forget about our shiny ideas by next morning and that understandable since nothing has been placed on the task board; so we go back to square 1. Steve V Nov 8 '12 at 11:03
Retrospectives are for Process Improvement
The purpose of a retrospective in Scrum is to "inspect and adapt" the team's process. It's not intended as a brainstorming session for product ideas, or for generating user stories that people want to see on the task boardit's about improving the team's internal process to do more of what works and less of what doesn't.
For example, your team may decide they need to revamp the "definition of done." Or perhaps they decide that they need to refactor the way they branch and merge the source code, or need to add a continuous integration server to the workflow.
Anything internal to the team goes into the Sprint Backlog (not the Product Backlog) and therefore doesn't require any consensus outside the team. the need for appropriations for a new CI server,[url=http://www.xantrex.cc]louis vuitton handbags[/url], or ongoing failures related to interteam handoffs) then of course the larger organization will need to be made aware of the issues.
The retrospective is about making issues visible, and allowing the team the leeway to selforganize around a solution. However, if your corporate culture doesn't truly allow the Scrum team to solve problems, the team has the right and the responsibility to raise the visibility of the issue, and then drop it squarely in management's lap.
For example, if the lack of a CI server is identified as a process bottleneck by your team, then this issue needs to be raised with the organization. If those holding the purse strings say "do without," then that's a business decision they need to live withthe team's job is simply to make the cost of that business decision fully visible.
That means that no one works unpaid overtime manually running integration tests, or does integration work "off the board." If it's work, it goes on the board!
If the organization says no to CI, then merging and integration testing simply become explicit stories on the Sprint Backlog that:consume time and effort; and
redirect resources, manhours, and story points away from new features.
The fact that these additional tasks reduce capacity for Product Backlog items is neither good nor bad; it's simply a natural consequence of the business decision, and as long as it is transparent and visible to both the team and the organization, the responsibility to accept reduced capacity or to change the situation belongs solely to management.
Facilitate the Scrum Retrospective.
Encourage the team to implement internal process improvements themselves.
Update process artifacts like the Sprint Backlog or "Definition of Done" poster to reflect any changes agreed to by the team.
Facilitate communication with the outside organization when issues are broader than the team's internal process.
And that's it. You're not a babysitter. Your job isn't to "manage" the results of the retrospective, to chase after people to make sure they're implementing changes, or anything else that smacks of micromanagement. You are a facilitator, a process referee, and a coach; don't lose site of the core role that enables Scrum as a process to work smoothly.

wqhdoidba

To share:The
,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

report from our correspondent (reporter Jiang Shaojing) "five four" period, the city will hold a series of activities in various forms, rich and colorful, the 93 anniversary of the 90 anniversary of the establishment of Chinese Communist Youth League and the "five four" movement.
is leading the broad member youth to understand the glorious history of the Communist Youth League, inherit and carry forward the "five four" spirit, practice the new building a innovative, rich and beautiful new Zhangzhou with youth, wisdom and strength,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], with the excellent result to meet the party's eighteen victory is held, in the majority of round municipal Party committee members of the Communist Youth League in the extensive "celebrate the party's eighteen big,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], youth building new Zhangzhou" series of theme activities, activities will continue until 2012 October. Among them, the main activities of the project include: Non-public Enterprise League Organization "compliance excellence", "red scarf to the party" series of activities,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], in 2012 the city's youth civilization quality service demonstration activities,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], "polished old brand, new vitality" youth civilization standardized construction activities. In addition, will also host various Reading Festival, science and technology festival, sports competition,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], "the grassroots, listen to voice, do real thing" theme activities and to participate in the "million cadres linked to poor households" activities. "Salt iodine Cup" held "five four" million people race,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], under the Youth Festival,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], · Zhangzhou youth entrepreneurship competition series of activities. Hold "under the same sky,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], sharing a piece of day care for the children of migrant workers" summer camp activities,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], "adolescent health personality into the community (Village)" to start the ceremony, special group of youth education management activities and competitions. At present,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], the portion of the project has been started,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], part will be launched.
相关的主题文章：

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

Zhangzhou inspection and Quarantine Bureau to support enterprises to develop new markets, through the development of import and export commodity quality safety risk investigation work, eliminate the quality safety hidden danger, ensure safety;

weoiqwpdn

The government��s Board of Audit and Inspection (BAI) announced Sunday the results of its probe of 141 state-invested companies,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], including the Korea Electric Power Corp. (KEPCO) and Pohang Iron and Steel Corp. (POSCO),[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], saying that structural reforms at state-invested firms have fallen short of expectations. According to the report,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], there has been little progress on reforms due to labor-management disputes. The BAI also questioned the commitment of companies to reform,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], saying many have failed to throw their full weight behind restructuring efforts.
In the case of Korea Highway Corp. subsidiary Korea Highway Control Corp.,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], shrinking new construction orders since April 1999 has left the company overstaffed. This April,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], the company told 123 employees that they could work from home and paid out W3.2 billion for their salaries. The BAI also said that the W55.5 billion in sales posted by Korea General Chemical Corp. during 1996-1999 was far below the firm��s production costs for the period,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], leading to operational losses of W194.1 billion. Plans to privatize the firm due to its dismal performance have,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], however,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], been delayed,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], with the company proposing a vastly unrealistic self-rescue plan which has seen the government throwing more public money at it.
(Lee Jong-won,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], [link widoczny dla zalogowanych])
相关的主题文章:

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

In court documents Kim claims that his constitutional right to pursue happiness has been violated because "the new Romanization system is not practical and inconsistent with reality, and so my right to pursue happiness as a professor has been infringed upon as I cannot teach the new Romanization to my students."

Barak

Basically its a term in scrum which is made for the improvement in production and organizing thing in a better way,That is the need of this moment because it has to do a lot with daily activities or managing things in a better way. Implementation should be through proper learning of scrum that is how it works.